Republicans Boost Attack on Kagan Memos for Marshall

By Laura Litvan, Bloomberg News

June 10 (Bloomberg) — Republicans stepped up criticism of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, saying memos she wrote as a law clerk for JusticeThurgood Marshall are evidence of judicial activism.

Kagan’s clerkship for Marshall in 1987 and 1988 will be a focus of her confirmation hearings, said Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona. He is a member of the Judiciary Committee that will hold hearings on Kagan’s nomination beginning June 28.

Her notes to Marshall on which cases the court should review “reveal time and time again an effort to reach a certain result in a case,” Kyl said. Senator Jeff Sessions, ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, also said at a news conference with Kyl today her views were “results-oriented.”

Obama nominated Kagan, 50, to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens on the nine-member high court. A former dean of Harvard Law School, Kagan is now U.S. solicitor general, the Obama administration’s chief courtroom lawyer.

Democrats, who control 59 of the Senate’s 100 seats, want to have Kagan confirmed well before the next Supreme Court term begins in October.

Kyl and Sessions pointed to a Kagan memo to Marshall in which she said she was “not sympathetic” to an individual’s claim that the District of Columbia’s firearms law violated his constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Sting Operation

The Republicans also distributed a memo in which Kagan said she was “a bit shocked” by a government sting operation that used the U.S. Postal Service to catch child sex predators. She said a federal appeals court may have been right to uphold the operation and the court should abstain from review. But she said Marshall should still order the government to file a legal brief in the matter.

“I think it indicates a developing lawyer who has a political bent to their legal work,” Sessions said of the memos.

At her Senate confirmation hearing to be solicitor general, Kagan said her memos were intended to reflect Marshall’s views. She called herself a “27-year-old pipsqueak” working for a “90-year-old giant in the law.”

Marshall asked his clerks “to channel him and to think about what cases he would want the court to decide,” Kagan said then. “And in that context, I think all of us were right to say, ‘Here are the cases which the court is likely to do good things with from your perspective, and here are the ones where they’re not.’”

Leahy’s Response

To read more, visit: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a93z7MInnpuk

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.